Religious, Charitable, etc., Institutions and Community Chest

S"..&I Department of the Treasury 'llt//l Internal Revenue Service IRS Tax Exemot and Government Entities Number: 202336025 Release Date: 9/8/2023
UIL: 501.03-00
CERIIFIED MAIL - Ret11nl Receipt Requested Dear
Why we are sending you ffds letter
Date:
JuneS.2023
Tu,_. ID number(laat 4 cfiOil&):
Form
Tax periodla ended:
P.-.on lo contact
Name:
Dm.mber:
Telephone:
Fax:
Lat-, to file petition with Untect ._.
Tu Court
This is a ftnal determination explaining why your organization doesn't qualify as an organization described in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 50l(c)(3) for the tax periods above.
Our adverse determination as to your exempt status was made for the following reasons:
You did not respond to our requests for additional infonnation regarding your fmances and activities as required under Treasury Regulation Section 1.6033-2(i)(2).
You have not demonstrated that you are both organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, or other exempt pmposes within the meaning ofIRC Section 501(c)(3). As such, you failed to meet the requirement ofIRC Section 50l(c)(3) and Treas. Reg. Sections l .501(c)(3)-1 (a).
Additionally, you have not demonstrated that you are operated exclusively for charitable. educational, or other exempt pm.poses within the meaning ofIRC Section 50l(c)(3) because the organization's assets inure to the benefit of a private shareholders or individuals.
Organizations that are not exempt under IRC Section 501 generally are required to file federal income tax returns and pay tax, where applicable. For further instructions, fonns and infonnation please visit IRS.gov.
Contributions to your organization are no longer deductible under IRC Section 170.
What you must do if you disapee with this determination
If you want to contest our final detennination, you have 90 days from the date this detennination letter was mailed to you to file a petition or complaint in one of the three federal courts listed below.
---
Letter 6337 (Rev. 8.a22)
CllalogNumber 14808E
How to :file your action for declaratory judgment
If you decide to contest this determination, you can file an action for declaratory judgment under the provisions of Section 7428 of the Code in either:
• The United States Tax Court,
• The United States Court of Federal Claims, or
• The United States District Court for the District of Columbia You must file a petition or complaint in one of these three courts within 90 days from the date we mailed this determination letter to you. You can download a fillable petition or complaint form and get information about filing at each respective court's website listed below or by contacting the Office of the Clerk of the Court at one of the addresses below. Be sure to include a copy of this letter and any attachments and the applicable filing fee with the petition or complaint.
You can eFile your completed U.S. Tax Court petition by following the instructions and user guides available on the Tax Court website at ustaxcourt.gov/dawson.html. You will need to register for a DAWSON account to do so. You may also file your petition at the address below:
United States Tax Court
400 Second Street, NW
Washington, DC 20217 ustaxcourt.gov The websites of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia contain instructions about how to file your completed complaint electronically. You may also file your complaint at one of the addresses below:
US Court of Federal Claims
717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, DC 20439 uscfc.uscourts.gov
US District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001 dcd.uscourts.gov Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed if you file a petition for declaratory judgment under IRC Section 7428.
We'll notify the appropriate state officials (as permitted by law) of our determination that you aren't an organization described in IRC Section 501(c)(3).
Letter 6337 (Rev. 8-2022)
Catalog Number 74808E
Information about the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service
The IRS office whose phone number appears at the top of the notice can best address and access your tax information and help get you answers. However, you may be eligible for free help from the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) if you can't resolve your tax problem with the IRS, or you believe an IRS procedure just isn't working as it should. T AS is an independent organization within the IRS that helps taxpayers and protects taxpayer rights. Contact your local Taxpayer Advocate Office at:
Or call TAS at 877-777-4778. For more information about TAS and your rights under the Taxpayer Bill of Rights, go to taxpayeradvocate.IRS.gov. Do not send your federal court pleading to the T AS address listed above.
Use the applicable federal court address provided earlier in the letter. Contacting TAS does not extend the time to file an action for declaratory judgment.
Where you can find more information
Enclosed are Publication 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer, and Publication 594, The IRS Collection Process, for more comprehensive information.
Find tax forms or publications by visiting IRS.gov/forms or calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676). If you have questions, you can call the person shown at the top of this letter.
If you prefer to write, use the address shown at the top of this letter. Include your telephone number, the best time to call, and a copy of this letter.
You may fax your documents to the fax number shown above, using either a fax machine or online fax service.
Protect yourself when sending digital data by understanding the fax service's privacy and security policies.
Keep the original letter for your records.
Enclosures:
Form 886-A
Form4621-A
Publications 1, 594, and 892
Sincerely,
I
P.im~
~
A. Brinkley
Director, Exempt Organizations Examinations
Letter 8337 (Rev. 8-2022)
Catalog Number 74808E
Name of Taxpayer:

# Issues

Issue 1 - Does the (
Internal Revenue Code section 501 (c)(3)?
Issue 2 - Does the available information indicate of anyone?
Facts: incorporated in on , see Attachment 1.
Year/Period Ended: ) qualify for exemption under assets inure to the benefit and Article II states Article VI provides a dissolution clause and states upon dissolution or winding up the Corporation, its assets remaining after payment, or provision for payment, of all debts and liabilities of this corporation shall be distributed to a nonprofit fund, foundation or corporation which is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, and/or religious purposes and which has established its tax exempt status under
Internal Revenue Code section 501 (c)(3).
Article VI I states The property of this corporation is irrevocably dedicated to religious purposes and no part of the net income or assets of this corporation shall ever inure to the benefit of any director, officer or member thereof or to the benefit of any private person. The Articles of Incorporation are signed by as the incorporator.
On submitted Form 1023, Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, see Attachment 2. Part I, box 2 shows , box 3 shows , , , box 6a shows as the primary contact, and box 6b provides a contact phone number. Part V shows as president & director, as secretary & director, and as Treasurer & Director; and all show , , as their contact address. Part X Public Charity Status, question Sa shows the box 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i) box is checked to indicate that the application is a church or a convention or association of churches and completed Schedule A Churches. attached Attachment 4, Appendix to Form 1023 to provide additional information and states from , is the authorized representative, but a Form 2848 was not in the case file. Attachment 4 provides a narrative of activities and states will host Sunday church services and Bible study on Wednesday and Sunday evenings. Part XI is signed by as president.
Form 886-A{Rcv.4-68)
Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended:
On the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Letter 1312, Request for Additional Information, to requesting resumes for all of officers, directors, and or trustees, see Attachment 3.
On the IRS issued Letter 1314, EO Determination Request Closed- Failure to Establish, to on which states the IRS did not receive the requested information and is closing the case without making a determination because the IRS does not have sufficient information to consider the request, see Attachment 4.
On filed Form 990-EZ, Short Form Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax, for the period ending . The heading of Form 990-EZ indicates initial return, an application is pending, shows , address and provides a contact number. Part I and II show zeros. Part IV shows as president & director, as secretary & director, and as Treasurer & Director. Part V shows the books and records are in care of , shows the , , and provides the same telephone number as the heading. Part VI shows as the Treasurer & Director but it is not signed. The paid preparer section shows from , and shows a contact telephone number. Schedule A shows identified as a church. Schedule O states mission is to The Secretary of State website shows status suspended, as of the date of this report, and references the . The website shows as the inactive date and shows a Statement of Information was due on , and presumably not filed.
On the IRS began an inquiry into activities and the examining Revenue Agent (RA) mailed Letter 5307, Church Tax Inquiry Notice, via certified mail, with inquiry questions to the , , address, see Attachment 5. Letter 5307 provided a response date, but a response was not provided.
On the United States Postal Service (USPS) returned PS Form 3811, Domestic Return Receipt, to the RA. Box A of the receipt shows an illegible signature, box B shows an illegible name, and box C shows as the delivery date, see Attachment 6.
On the RA mailed Letter 5308, Follow Up Church Tax Inquiry, to via certified mail, as a follow up to Letter 5307, to the , address, see Attachment 7. Letter 5308 included Letter 5307 and follow up Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended: questions. Letter 5308 provided provided. as a response date, but a response was not On the RA initiated an exam of and mailed Letter 5309, Notice of Church Examination, via certified mail, to the address, see Attachment 8.
The USPS returned PS Form 3811 to the RA. Box A of the receipt shows an illegible signature, box B shows an illegible name, and box C shows as the delivery date, see Attachment 9. Letter 5309 provided a response date, but a response was not provided.
On the RA mailed Letter 5464, Information Document Request Cover Letter -Exempt Organization, and Form 4564, Information Document Request (IDR), to to the , , address, see Attachment 10.
The IDR provided a response date, but a response was not received.
On the RA mailed Letter 3164-E, Third Party Contact, to to the , , address to advising that the IRS plans to contact other individuals regarding . Letter 3164-E allowed to request a list of individuals the IRS plans to contact, a request was not received.
On the RA mailed Forms 2039, Summons, to , and requesting banking information, each responded and provided banking records related to records show responded and provided records for account ending with as the account owner and the . The and and/or address. The signature card for the account shows as account holders. Check images show signature.
Bank records show utilized in the and years, the table below shows the total incoming and outgoing funds:
Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended:
Account Endi
Year _DeJ:?_osit~ Debits Checks -
- -
Fees
1 1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1 1
-
Sub Totals:
1 .: ..
- .. osits:
Total E enditures: ..!
-
The statements were reviewed and the description provided in the withdraws and other debits section show debit purchases from commercial establishments such as ' ' , , , and . The purchases alone total , The statements show at least 16 bank withdraws totaling$ including a $ withdraw on to close out the account. provided check images and of the checks were signed by and total $ , . Some of the payee names indicate individuals and some indicate a commercial business but most of the images show the memo line is blank. check images show signed checks totaling $ , . Payees were individuals and commercial businesses but most of the images show the memo line is blank. Three check images show the payee is and total$ , responded and provided records for account ending with . The records show as the account owner and the address. The signature card for the account shows as the president and account holder. Check images show and/or signature.
Bank records show utilized in the table below shows the total incoming and outgoing funds: and years, the
Form 886-A(itev.4-68)
Department of the Treasury- Intemal Revenue Service
Form886A Schedule No. or Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer:
Year Dep~sit~
-
-
!
- --
-
-
! !
Sub Totals: .! ,I .-
Year/Period Ended:
Account Ending
- -
Checks Debits Fees
- -
- --
- E Withdraws Other Withdraws
-
- - - -
-
-
-
- -
! .. ,_ . - ,_ .. ,_
-
- -
-
!
! ! ! ! .. ,_ ..
I- .! .!
! ,1
~ ..
Total Deposits:
!
Total Expenditures: ..! .!
-
!
- ..! statements were reviewed and the description provided in the A TM & The DEBIT CARE WITHDRAWALS section show debit purchases from commercial establishments such as , , , and withdrawals totaling $ close out the account. , , , , , , . The bank statements also show nine bank including a $ withdrawal on to check images and Chase Bank provided checks were signed by . Payees were individuals and commercial businesses but most of the images show the memo line is blank. Two checks made out two check made out to total $ total $ , total $ , seven checks made out to , , five checks made out to totaling , , and two check made out to $ , total $ , . The and payments to are discussed later in this report. responded and provided records for account ending with records show , , . The as the account owner and the address. A signature card was not available, all available paid check images show signature and the account was and closed on opened on ---Account Ending Year ____ De~osit~ Fees Debits Checks
- -
- ..! statements A TM/Debit Card transaction this statement period The section shows six transactions including a $ withdraw on closing , the account. The debit transaction show purchases from restaurants and gas stations.
Department of the Treaswy - lntemal Revenue Service Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended: provided check images and of those images show the checks were signed by . Payees were individuals and commercial businesses but most of the images show the memo line is blank.
The table below shows the total deposit and expenditure amounts:
Total Deposits and Expenditures De osits Totals:
Ex enditures ..! ..!
' "
On the RA mailed Letters 1995, Third Party Contact Letters to Request Information, to the , , and . The , and responded and their responses are discussed later in this report.
On the RA mailed Letters 1995 to , and ' , but they did not respond. response states they funded a private loan to a company called to purchase a property at , , and received four payments totaling $ , , see Attachment 11. A property search revealed that the transaction was conducted by and a summons was provided to on and check images show $ was paid to , see attachment 12. responded to the summons with , documents. The documents were reviewed and they show the property was purchased by ( ).
The Order Sheet is dated , shows as the buyer, shows Attention , and shows , , , as address. The documents contained an ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SOLE INCORPORA TORS OF , A Limited Liability Company dated and states that , , and were elected to serve as Directors of . The FINAL BUYER'S STATEMENT shows the contract sales price is$ M. The documents contained a Limited Liability Company Agreement , a Limited Liability
Name of Taxpayer:
Company document executed by and A to that documents provides a list of member and shows and both list Attachment 13.
Year/Period Ended: on . Exhibit and as their address, see ( ) filed Limited Liability Company Articles of Organization on with the Secretary of State and state purpose is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a limited liability company may be organized under the Limited Liability Act.
IRS records show filed Forms 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, for the tax years ending to and issued a Schedule K to and both years. All Schedule K show and each had a 50% interest in check images show as the payee on seven checks totaling$ , see attachment 14.
On a ( ) attorney initially responded to Letter 1995 with a telephone call to the RA and said the was able to shut down because it was operating as a marijuana dispensary without proper approval. The attorney later provided documents related to the legal action to shut down , see Attachment 15.
The Complaint, Case Number with the , was filed by the ' , and ' Attorney on ) and lists as the defendants.
The Complaint enumerated three causes of action. The first cause is a Public Nuisance Based Upon Distribution of Marijuana at real property and business commonly known as , located at , . The Complaint states in part is owner/operator, manager of is the secretary/operator/owner/member of The second cause is "Public Nuisance" and "Nuisance Per Se" Based Upon Violations of the Municipal Code at , . address. The Complaint states is violating the Zoning Code, Title of the ( ) . Title marijuana and the and is located in a of marijuana Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended:
The third cause is Unlawful and Unfair Businesses Practices Based Upon Violations of Law and Acts/Omissions: at address. The Complaint states is illegally distributing marijuana from its location because it does not have a permit to distribute marijuana.
The filed a Declaration from the for the on with the Court in support of the Complaint and states the facts set forth herein are within my personal knowledge and, if swom as a witness, I could and would testify competently to such facts. The Supervisor states that based on his own investigation and review of and proceedings he is familiar with the property at being used to sell and distribute marijuana, which is a violation of , see Attachment 16.
The Supervisor states that he is familiar with the provision of the Permanent Injunction filed with the Court on which prohibits the property at , , from being used to make medical marijuana available. The Permanent Injunction lists , , , and as the defendants, see Attachment 16, Exhibit A.
The Supervisor states that on he reviewed page and he is informed and believes that is a website that allows businesses to set up a free account and post photos and message their customers. indicates its located at , and its website is , see Attachment 16, Exhibit E.
The Supervisor states that on he reviewed page, is a website that claims to be the most reliable online resource to find cannabis storefronts, doctors, and deals. page indicates is located at , , , and incl~des a menu of different marijuana products and pricing. The products include different strains of marijuana, such as , as well as extracts, edibles and topicals, see Attachment 16, Exhibit F.
The Supervisor states that he executed an at property on and he took photographs of the first and second floors. He also inspected the basement floor and took pictures of two packages addressed to , see Attachment 16, Exhibits G,H, I, and J. filed a page response to the Complaint on with the Court and objects to Plaintiff's Request in its entirety to the extent that it does not specify a reasonable time and place for inspection and copying, see Attachment 17.
Page and page are a copy of Application for
Fonn 886-A{Rev.4-68)
Department oftbe Treasury- Internal Revenue Service
Form886A
Name of Taxpayer:
Membership. The Application states response is titled Page of provides:
Page provides: also filed a page Declaration of Year/Period Ended: and in support of with , see Attachment 18. The Declaration states in part: I, the Court on , declare as follows: and have been since it
1. I am a at the opened in
2. I provide weekly on at pm.
Department of the Treasury - Intcmal Revenue Service Fonn886A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or Exhibit Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended:
3. Recently the has requested an additional at : pm to accommodate additional members.
4. My are based and focus on helping the members of the achieve a greater appreciation of the based on utilization of cannabis as
5. provides for greater plasticity of thought in analysis and with The provided a for to , , and responded. Some of the records are redacted for employee information and sensitive proprietary business information including pricing information. Some of the documents were redacted completely, other documents were printed emails exchanged between and and are not attached to this report. The response contains approximately invoices that show at , , as the customer, have a date range from to , and appear to be issued on the th of the month, see Attachment 19.
The response contains copies of what refers to Marketing Agreements. The copy on pages and show the same date , show as the name of the dispensary, and is signed by as the manager. Pages and show the same date , show as the name of the dispensary, and is signed by as the manager. Page shows as the date, shows as the name of the dispensary, and is signed by as the manager. Page shows as the date, shows as the name of the dispensary, and is signed by as the manager. provided a related to provided a copy of the page response to the of on and among the documents Marketing Agreement with executed on , see Attachment 20. is listed as the dispensary at the , address. provided an eight page response on . to the Request for the Board of Directors and the names to present, see Attachment 21. individuals. identity of all persons who serve on the of all employees and volunteers from provided information on page response contained a REPORT conducted on the property located at
Department of the Treaswy - Internal Revenue Service Form886A Name of Taxpayer: was ordered by was sent to Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or Exhibit Year/Period Ended: on . The report shows the inspection , the property owner is listed as unknown, and the report , see Attachment 22.
On the RA called , this is the number for and for , records custodian, given on the F990-EZ. The call went right to voice mail, no greeting other than leave a message was provided, RA left a message, but did not get a call back.
On the RA called , this number was secured from the business signature card for , listed as the president. The person who answered, presumably a male, said he was not nor was he associated with . He did say that must have had this number because the person who answered has received numerous calls looking for On the RA called because this number was found in a search for . The search indicated this number belonged to . The first time the RA called the number was busy, the number was called again on and numerous other times but the number was busy.
On the RA conducted a search on and found that , and work for at in . The search showed as the chief executive officer. A Secretary of State search found as the Agent at in On the RA conducted a search for with the address, as shown on the F990EZ and a hit provided the address for On the RA spoke to different numbers, and not sure who they belonged to. and , this is the same address as the at and he provided two , associated with but was also provided two possible email addresses The number is the number shown on the signature card. The number was called and it sounded as if the call was answered but no one responded to the RA. The RA called a second time and left a voice message, the greeting did not reveal anything about the owner. An email was sent to both email addresses was not received.
Form 886-A(llev.4-68) and . , but a response Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended:
On the RA conducted a name search for with the address and no hits were found. RA conducted another search with the as the resident city and did not identify any individual associated with the the RA conducted a name search for with the address and no hits were found. RA conducted another search with the as the resident city and did not identify any individual associated with the On the RA conducted a name search for with the address, as shown on the F990EZ and no hits were found. RA conducted another search with the as the resident city and did not identify any individual associated with the On the RA conducted a name search for with address and a hit found. The hit showed , . The hit also provided , , and phone numbers. The was previously provided by , the number was called various time but no one ever answered, and the On number was called various times but the phone was always busy. the RA conducted a name search for address and no hits were found. with the On the RA conducted a driver's license search for . The search was conducted with and without as the state of residence, but no hits were found. the RA conducted an address search for and in IRS records.
The search for showed
' ' , and . The search for showed , and On the RA sent a drafted letter to at the , , , requesting his assistance with a tax matter, a response was not received, and the letter was later returned by the USPS, see Attachment 23.
On the RA sent a drafted letter to at the , , , requesting his assistance with a tax matter, a response was not received, and the letter was later returned by the USPS, see Attachment 24.
Department of the Treaswy - lntemal Revenue Service Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended:
On the RA sent a drafted letter to at the , , requesting his assistance with a tax matter, a response was not received, and the letter was later returned by the USPS, see Attachment 25.
On the RA sent Letter 5464 and three Forms 4564 to to the , , address, see Attachment 26. The Forms 4564 provided a listing of bank transactions that give rise to potential excess benefit transactions and requested contemporaneous substantiation and documentation for the transactions. Forms 4564 provide a response due date, but a response was not provided.
On the RA sent Letter 5464 and three Forms 4564 to to the , , , address, see Attachment 27. The Forms 4564 provided a listing of bank transactions that give rise to potential excess benefit transactions and requested contemporaneous substantiation and documentation for the transactions. Forms 4564 provide a response due date, the letter was retuned by the USPS on On the RA sent Letter 5464 and three Forms 4564 to to the , , , address, see Attachment 28. The Forms 4564 provided a listing of bank transactions that give rise to potential excess benefit transactions and requested contemporaneous substantiation and documentation for the transactions. Forms 4564 provide a response due date, but a response was not provided and the letter was returned by the USPS on On the RA sent Letter 5464 and three Forms 4564 to to the , , , , see Attachment 29.
The Forms 4564 provided a listing of bank transactions that give rise to potential excess benefit transactions and requested contemporaneous substantiation and documentation for the transactions. Forms 4564 provide a response due date, but a response was not provided.
On the RA sent a drafted letter to to the I checks paid to by drafted letter provides a USPS on Law: address requesting assistance regarding seven totaling $ , , see Attachment 30. The response due date; the letter was returned by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 501(c)(3) exempts from federal income tax organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, and other Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended: exempt purposes, provided that no part of the organization's net earnings inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.
IRC section 511 imposes a tax at corporate rates under section 11 on the unrelated business taxable income of certain tax-exempt organizations.
IRC section 6001 provides that every person liable for any tax imposed by this title, or for the collection thereof, shall keep such records, render such statements, make such returns, and comply with such rules and regulations as the Secretary may from time to time prescribe. Whenever in the judgment of the Secretary it is necessary, he may require any person, by notice served upon such person or by regulations, to make such returns, render such statements, or keep such records, as the Secretary deems sufficient to show if such person is liable for tax under this title.
IRC section 6033(a)(1 ), except as provided in section 6033(a)(2) , provides in part that every organization exempt from tax undersection 501 (a) shall file an annual return, stating specifically the items of gross income, receipts and disbursements, and such other information for the purposes of carrying out the internal revenue laws as the Secretary may by forms or regulations prescribe, and keep such records, render under oath such statements, make such other returns, and comply with such rules and regulations as the Secretary may from time to time prescribe.
Federal Tax Regulations (Regulations) section 1.501(c)(3)-1 (a) states in part that in order to be exempt as an organization described in Code section 501 (c)(3), the organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt. The term "exempt purpose or purposes", as used in this section, means any purpose or purposes specified in section 501 (c)(3).
Regulations section 1.501 (c)(3)-1 (b)(4) states in part that an organization is not organized exclusively for one or more exempt purposes unless its assets are dedicated to an exempt purpose. An organization's assets will be considered dedicated to an exempt purpose, for example, if, upon dissolution, such assets would, by reason of a provision in the organization's articles or by operation of law, be distributed for one or more exempt purposes, or to the Federal government, or to a State or local government, for a public purpose, or would be distributed by a court to another organization to be used in such manner as in the judgment of the court will best accomplish the general purposes for which the dissolved organization was organized.
However, an organization does not meet the organizational test if its articles or the law
Department of the Treasury - Intemal Revenue Service Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended: of the State in which it was created provide that its assets would, upon dissolution, be distributed to its members or shareholders.
Regulations section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) provides that an organization will not be regarded as operated exclusively for exempt purposes if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of exempt purposes.
United States Code (USC), Title 21, Section 802(16) defines marijuana as "all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L. whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin."
USC Title 21, Section 821 (c) , Sch. l(c)(10) lists marijuana as a hallucinogenic substance and includes it on schedule I of the Schedules of Controlled Substances. A schedule I substance is a substance that (1) has a high potential for abuse; (2) has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States; and (3) there is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug under medical supervision.
USC Title 21, Section 841 (a) , known as The Controlled Substances Act, states that it is illegal for anyone to knowingly or intentionally manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a controlled substance.
Revenue Ruling 75-384, 1975-2 C.B. 204, holds that a nonprofit organization, whose purpose was to promote world peace, disarmament, and nonviolent direct action, did not qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3) or (c)(4). The organization's primary activity was to sponsor antiwar protest demonstrations in which demonstrators were urged to violate local ordinances and commit acts of civil disobedience. Citing the law of trusts, the ruling stated that all charitable organizations are subject to the requirement that their purposes cannot be illegal or contrary to public policy.
In Ould v. Washington Hospital for Foundlings, 95 U.S. 303, 311 , 24 L. Ed. 450 (1877), the Court noted that "[a] charitable use, where neither law nor public policy forbids, may be applied to almost anything that tends to promote the well-doing and well-being of social man."
In Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279, 283 , 66 S. Ct. 112, 90 L. Ed. 67, 1945 C.B. 375(1945), the Supreme Court held that the "presence of a single .. [nonexempt] purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly ... [exempt] purposes."
In Harding Hospital, Inc. v. United States, 505 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir. 1974), the court held that an organization has the burden of proving that it satisfies the requirements of Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended: the particular exemption statute. The court noted that whether an organization has satisfied the operational test is a question of fact.
In Mysteryboy Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2010-13 (2010), the Tax Court held that the organization failed the operational test partly because the organization proposed to promote illegal activities.
Taxpayer's Position: did not respond to any of the IRS correspondence and as such position to either issue is not known.
Government's Position:
Issue 1 - should not be recognized as an organization described in IRC section 501(c)(3) because it failed to demonstrate that it qualified for such recognition, the information uncovered by the IRS shows distributes cannabis, and members consume cannabis.
Based on the above facts, has not demonstrated that it is organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes or more of the purposes specified in IRC section 501(c)(3). If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.
Based on the information we have uncovered, we determined that is not organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes under IRC section 501 (c)(3) .
An organization can be recognized as exempt under IRC section 501 (c)(3) only if it shows that it is both organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, or other exempt purposes. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.
Federal law classifies cannabis as a controlled substance, as detailed in USC Title 21, Sections 802 and 821(c), Schedule l(c)(10).Federal law, under USC Title 21, Section 841, prohibits the manufacture, distribution, possession, or dispensing of a controlled substance. The consumption of cannabis is a substantial part of activity and . The consumption and distribution of cannabis is an illegal activity - current federal law prohibits the use of cannabis. Because engages in activities that contravene federal law, does not serve a substantial exempt purpose. does not satisfy the operational test of Regulations section 1.501 (c)(3)-1 (c)(1). Whether an organization operates exclusively in furtherance of an exempt purpose is a question of fact. An organization seeking tax-exempt status under IRC ---
Department of the Treaswy- Internal Revenue Service
Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended: section 501(c)(3) carries the burden of proving that it satisfies the requirements of the statute, see Harding Hospital, 505 F.2dat 1071. Only an insubstantial portion of the activity of an exempt organization may further a nonexempt purpose. Because is engaged in activities that contravene federal law, serves a substantial nonexempt purpose. As the Supreme Court held in Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, the presence of a single nonexempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes.
The common law of trusts specifies that a charitable trust cannot be created for an illegal purpose. See Restatement (Second)of Trusts, Section 377. Similarly, the Supreme Court noted in Quid v. Washington Hospital for Foundlings , that "[a]charitable use, where neither law nor public policy forbids, may be applied to almost anything that tends to promote the well-doing and well-being of social man.' Like a trust, an IRC Section 501(c)(3) organization cannot be created for a purpose that is illegal. The literature uncovered by the IRS and response to the complaint show specific purposes is the consumption and distribution of cannabis supposedly during and after religious services. Because engages in activities that contravene federal law, serves a substantial nonexempt purpose. See
Rev. Rul.75-384 , supra; Mysteryboy, Inc. v. Comm'r. is not described in Regulations section 1.501 (c)(3)-1 (d)(2) which provides that the term "charitable" as used in IRC section 501(c)(3) in its generally accepted legal sense. Advancement of religion has long been recognized as a charitable purpose.
However, a trust is invalid if its purpose is illegal. The common law of trusts specifies that a charitable trust cannot be created for an illegal purpose. Because engages in activities that contravene federal law, serves a substantial nonexempt purpose.
Issue 2 - Based on the information in the fact section, funds inured to the benefit of and . Both individuals have authority over finances and both have a personal and private interests in activities.
The , and expenditures indicate a personal use by and and did not establish the purchases furthered an exempt purpose. is owned and operated by and and as such any payments to are indistinguishable from payment to and . Any payments to that are not substantiated to further
Department of the Treaswy - Internal Revenue Service Name of Taxpayer: charitable purposes constitute inurement and in this case the payments furthered an exempt purpose.
Year/Period Ended: did not establish The incorporating document dated (Attachment 12) shows and are two of the directors. The agreement dated (Attachment 12) shows as one of the founders. Any payments to that are not substantiated to further a charitable purposes constitute inurement because the payments are in effect being made to and in this case did not establish the payments furthered an exempt purpose.
The debits purchases and withdraws total $ , for both years under examination, most indicate a personal benefit, did not provide any support to show the purchases further a charitable purpose, and thus the debit purchases constitute inurement to and check payments total$ , for both years under examination, the payee's name does not indicate the payment further a charitable purpose, did not provide any support to show the payments purpose, and thus the check payments constitute inurement to and The existence of inurement is exemplified by the $ , payment to because they ordered a pest inspection of the property, clearly indicating they were doing work on the property; the property was purchased with funds but lists as the owner, which is controlled by and The debits purchases total $ , for both years under examination, most indicate a personal benefit, did not provide any support to show the purchases serve a charitable purpose, and thus the debit purchase constitute inurement to The withdrawals totaling $ did not serve a charitable purpose, and furthered a charitable purpose. were made by the account holder, did not establish that the funds The two checks paid to totaling $ , and the two check paid to totaling $ , are examples of assets inuring to the benefit of and because no support was provided to show the payments furthered a charitable purpose. The seven checks paid to totaling $ are examples of assets inuring to the benefit of and because and are the only partners in and because no support was provided to
Department of the Treaswy - Intemal Revenue Service Name of Taxpayer: Year/Period Ended: show the payments furthered a charitable purpose. The five checks paid to totaling $ , is another example of assets inuring to the benefit of and because provided service to the , which is owned by the , which is controlled by and The $ , payment to were used to purchase the by , which is operated by and constitutes prohibited inurement because no support was provided to show the purchase furthered a charitable purpose. The RA identified$ , payments to for the purchase of the property owned by . The memo section of the checks shows , which is the loan number referenced in the Final Buyer's Statement obtained from . The statement further identifies as the buyer of the property and as the lender.
The debits purchases and withdraws total $ , for the year, none indicate a charitable purpose, did not provide any support to show the purchases serve a charitable purpose, and thus the expenditures constitute inurement.

# Conclusion

Issue 1 - should not be recognized as a tax exempt organizations as · described in IRC section 501(c)(3). An organization claiming to be a is not required to submit a recognition request and is considered to be exempt under IRC 501 (c)(3) based on their assertion. Therefore the effective date of revocation is Issue 2 - lnurement exists because did not demonstrate that any of its expenditures totaling $ , furthered a charitable purpose.
Department of the Treaswy- Internal Revenue Service