Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections

Internal Revenue Service
Number: 202326012
Release Date: 6/30/2023
Index Number: 2632.00-00, 2642.00-00,
9100.00-00
---
---
---
---
Legend
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
---, ID No. ---
Telephone Number:
---
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04
PLR-119541-22
Date:
March 31, 2023
---
Taxpayer =
---
---
Firm =
---
Trust 1 =
---
---
Trust 2 =
---
---
Trust 3 =
---
---
Trust 4 =
---
---
Trust 5 =
---
---
Children’s Trusts =
---
---
---
---
---
Date 1 = ---
Date 2 = ---
Date 3 = ---
Date 4 = ---
Date 5 = ---
Year 1 = ---
Year 2 = ---
Year 3 = ---
Year 4 = ---
PLR-119541-22 2
Year 5 = ---
Year 6 = ---
Year 7 = ---
Year 8 = ---
Year 9 = --- x = ---
Dear ---:
This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated October 3, 2022, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to elect out under § 2632(c)(5) of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption automatic allocation rules with respect to certain transfers to trusts.
The facts and representations submitted are as follows:
On Date 1 of Year 1, a date after December 31, 2000, Taxpayer established and funded Trust 1, an irrevocable grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT). Taxpayer’s retained interest in Trust 1 terminated on Date 1 of Year 3. The remaining principal of Trust 1 passed in equal shares to Children’s Trusts, each a separate trust for the primary benefit of each of Taxpayer’s children. Children’s Trusts have GST potential. For GST tax purposes, the estate tax inclusion period (ETIP) with respect to Taxpayer’s transfer to Trust 1 closed on Date 1 of Year 3.
On Date 2 of Year 2, Taxpayer established and funded Trust 2, another GRAT.
Taxpayer’s retained interest in Trust 2 terminated on Date 2 of Year 4. The remaining principal in Trust 2 passed in equal shares to Children’s Trusts. For GST tax purposes, the ETIP with respect to Taxpayer’s transfer to Trust 2 closed on Date 2 of Year 4.
On Date 3 of Year 4, Taxpayer established and funded Trust 3, another GRAT.
Taxpayer’s retained interest in Trust 3 terminated on Date 3 of Year 6. The remaining principal in Trust 3 passed in equal shares to Children’s Trusts. For GST tax purposes, the ETIP with respect to Taxpayer’s transfer to Trust 3 closed on Date 3 of Year 6.
Also in Year 4, Taxpayer made an additional direct transfer of $x to each of the Children’s Trusts.
On Date 4 of Year 5, Taxpayer established and funded Trust 4, another GRAT.
Taxpayer’s retained interest in Trust 4 terminated on Date 4 of Year 7. The remaining principal in Trust 4 passed in equal shares to Children’s Trusts. For GST tax purposes, the ETIP with respect to Taxpayer’s transfer to Trust 4 closed on Date 4 of Year 7.
On Date 5 of Year 6, Taxpayer established and funded Trust 5, another GRAT.
Taxpayer’s retained interest in Trust 5 terminated on Date 5 of Year 8. The remaining PLR-119541-22 3 principal in Trust 5 passed in equal shares to Children’s Trusts. For GST tax purposes, the ETIP with respect to Taxpayer’s transfer to Trust 5 closed on Date 5 of Year 8.
Taxpayer retained Firm to prepare Taxpayer's Form 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return for Years 1 through 8. Taxpayer did not intend for any portion of her GST exemption to be applied to the transfers she made to Trusts 1 through 5 (as described above) or to the direct transfer she made to each of Children’s Trusts in Year 4. Firm, however, did not advise Taxpayer that under the rules of § 2632(c), a portion of Taxpayer’s GST exemption would be automatically allocated to these transfers. In addition, Firm did not advise Taxpayer of the ability to elect out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption by making an election under § 2632(c)(5) on Form 709. As a result, Taxpayer failed to make an election on Taxpayer’s Forms 709 for Years 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 to opt out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption to the transfers Taxpayer made to Trusts 1 through 5. In addition, Taxpayer failed to make an election on Taxpayer’s Form 709 for Year 4 to opt out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption for any and all transfers made to Children’s Trusts. In Year 9, Attorney discovered the failure to opt out.
It has been represented that, to date, no taxable distributions, taxable terminations, or any other events have occurred with respect to Trusts 1 through 5 or Children’s Trusts that would give rise to a GST tax liability. In addition, no other transfers other than those described above have been made to Children’s Trusts.
Ruling Requested
Taxpayer requests an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to elect under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(I) to have automatic allocation of GST exemption not apply to the transfers she made in Year 1 to Trust 1, in Year 2 to Trust 2, in Year 4 to Trust 3, in Year 5 to Trust 4, and in Year 6 to Trust 5. In addition, Taxpayer requests an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to elect under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(II) to have automatic allocation of GST exemption not apply to any and all transfers to Children’s Trusts.

# Law and Analysis

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as, (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.
Section 2602 provides that the amount of GST tax is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines applicable rate as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.
Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by such individual (or their executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the PLR-119541-22 4 transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.
Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.
Section 2632(c)(1) provides that if any individual makes an indirect skip during such individual's lifetime, any unused portion of such individual's GST exemption shall be allocated to the property transferred to the extent necessary to make the inclusion ratio for such property zero. If the amount of the indirect skip exceeds such unused portion, the entire unused portion shall be allocated to the property transferred.
Under § 2632(c)(3)(A), the term “indirect skip” means any transfer of property (other than a direct skip) subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12 made to a GST trust.
Section 2632(c)(3)(B) provides, in part, that the term “GST trust” means a trust that could have a generation-skipping transfer with respect to the transferor unless an exception enumerated in § 2632(c)(3)(B)(i)-(vi) applies.
Section 2632(c)(4) provides that for purposes of § 2632(c), an indirect skip to which § 2642(f) applies shall be deemed to have been made only at the close of the ETIP.
The fair market value of such transfer shall be the fair market value of the trust property at the close of the ETIP.
Section 2632(c)(5)(A)(i) provides that an individual may elect to have § 2632(c) not apply to: (I) an indirect skip, or (II) any and all transfers made by such individual to a particular trust. Section 2632(c)(5)(B)(i) provides that an election under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(I) shall be deemed to be timely if filed on a timely filed gift tax return for the calendar year in which the transfer was made or deemed to have been made pursuant to § 2632(c)(4) or on such later date or dates as may be prescribed by the Secretary. Section 2632(c)(5)(B)(ii) provides that an election under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(II) may be made on a timely filed gift tax return for the calendar year for which the election is to become effective.
Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that, in the case of an indirect skip made after December 31, 2000, to which § 2642(f) (relating to transfers subject to an ETIP) does not apply, the transferor's unused GST exemption is automatically allocated to the property transferred (but not in excess of the fair market value of the property on the date of the transfer). This automatic allocation is effective whether or not a Form 709 is filed reporting the transfer, and is effective as of the date of the transfer to which it relates. An automatic allocation is irrevocable after the due date of the Form 709 for the calendar year in which the transfer is made. In the case of an indirect skip to which § 2642(f) does apply, the PLR-119541-22 5 indirect skip is deemed to be made at the close of the ETIP and the GST exemption is deemed to be allocated at that time.
Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(ii) provides that, except as otherwise provided, the transferor may prevent the automatic allocation of GST exemption with regard to an indirect skip (including indirect skips to which § 2642(f) may apply) by making an election as provided in § 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii).

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(A) provides, in relevant part, that a transferor may prevent the automatic allocation of GST exemption (elect out) with respect to any transfer or transfers constituting an indirect skip made to a trust or to one or more separate shares that are treated as separate trusts under § 26.2654-1(a)(1). A transferor may elect out with respect to – (1) one or more prior-year transfers subject to § 2642(f) (regarding ETIPs) made by the transferor to a specified trust or trusts;

(2) one or more (or all) current year transfers made by the transferor to a specified trust or trusts;

(3) one or more (or all future transfers made by the transferor to a specified trust or trusts;

(4) all future transfers made by the transferor to all trusts (whether or not in existence at the time of the election out); or (5) any combination of (1) through (4).

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(B) provides that to elect out, the transferor must attach an election out statement to a Form 709 filed within the time period provided in § 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(C). In general, the election out statement must identify the trust, and specifically must provide that the transferor is electing out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption with respect to the described transfer or transfers. Under § 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(C), to elect out, the Form 709 with the attached election out statement must be filed on or before the due date for timely filing the Form 709 for the calendar year in which the ETIP closes.
Section 26.2632-1(c)(1)(i) provides that a direct skip or an indirect skip that is subject to an ETIP is deemed to have been made only at the close of the ETIP. The transferor may prevent the automatic allocation of GST exemption to a direct skip or an indirect skip by electing out of the automatic allocation rules at any time prior to the due date of the Form 709 for the calendar year in which the close of the ETIP occurs (whether or not any transfer was made in the calendar year for which the Form 709 was filed, and whether or not a Form 709 otherwise would be required to be filed for that year).
Section 2642(b)(1)(A) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1), the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of § 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of an ETIP, its value at the time of the close of the ETIP.
PLR-119541-22 6
Section 2642(f)(1) provides that for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, if an individual makes an inter vivos transfer of property, and the value of such property would be includible in the gross estate of such individual under chapter 11 if such individual died immediately after making such transfer (other than by reason of § 2035), any allocation of GST exemption to such property shall not be made before the close of the ETIP (and the value of such property shall be determined under § 2642(f)(2)).
Section 2642(f)(3) provides that for purposes of § 2642(f), the term “estate tax inclusion period” means any period after the transfer described in paragraph (1) during which the value of the property involved in such transfer would be includible in the gross estate of the transferor under chapter 11 if the transferor died.
Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an election under § 2632(c)(5).
Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under § 2642(g)(1), the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.
Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that, under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-2 provides an automatic extension of time for making certain elections.
Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, a taxpayer may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides, in part, that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
PLR-119541-22 7
Under § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make an election under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(I) that the automatic allocation rules not apply to the transfers Taxpayer made in Year 1 to Trust 1, in Year 2 to Trust 2, in Year 4 to Trust 3, in Year 5, to Trust 4, and in Year 6 to Trust 5. In addition, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make an election under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(II) to have automatic allocation of GST exemption not apply to any and all transfers to Children’s Trusts. The election for each of Trust 1 through 5 should be made on an amended Form 709 for the year in which the ETIP closed for that trust.
The election for the Children’s Trusts should be made on an amended Form 709 for Year 4. The elections should be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, at the following address: Internal Revenue Service Center, Attn: E&G, Stop 824G, 7940 Kentucky Drive, Florence, KY 41042-2915. A copy of this letter should be attached to the Forms 709.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by Taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-119541-22 8
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
Enclosure (1) cc:
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs & Special Industries
By: ____
Leslie H. Finlow
Senior Technician Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)