CCA 201504016
Miscellaneous Issues
ID:
UILC:
CCA_2014091817230310
9999.00-00
[Third Party Communication:
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Number: 201504016
Release Date: 1/23/2015
From:
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 5:23:03 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Ex Parte Question
You have asked whether Appeals must follow the ex parte communication rules when it is coordinating the settlement of an Appeals case with Area Counsel when there is a related case in Counsel jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions of IRM 8.4.1.17.1, Settlement of Related Cases. That subsection falls under the general heading of IRM 8.4, Appeals Docketed Cases, IRM 8.4.1, Procedures for Processing and Settling Docketed Cases and IRM 8.4.1.17, Settlement of Docketed Cases. IRM 8.4.1.17.1 generally provides that Appeals must coordinate with Counsel, and receive Counsel approval of settlement terms, when settling a case for which a related case is pending in Counsel jurisdiction. It does not make a distinction between Appeals non-docketed cases and Appeals docketed cases. As you know, IRM 8.4.1.17.1 does not appear to have been updated since the clarification of the ex parte communication rules in Revenue Procedure 2012-18.
It is our view that, if the substantive communication between Appeals and
Counsel concerning the terms of the proposed Appeals settlement pertains to a docketed case in Appeals jurisdiction, then Rev. Proc. 2012-18 Sec. 2.06(2)(a) would apply as an exception to the ex parte rules. However, if the substantive communication pertains to a non-docketed open Appeals case, the ex parte rules must be observed in accordance with Rev. Proc. 2012-18 Sec. 2.03(13). The field attorney served as an advocate for the originating function in the related case, and the Counsel input (oral or written) on the Appeals settlement would have to be shared with the taxpayer or taxpayer’s representative, with an opportunity for a response, as set forth in Rev. Proc.
2012-18. See also, CC Notice-2012-010, Update of Rules Governing Ex Parte
Communications Between Chief Counsel Attorneys and Employees of Appeals.
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- plr-201504019 · Grants to Individuals
- plr-201504018 · Grants to Individuals
- plr-201504017 · Private v. Public Interest Served
- plr-201504009 · Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
- plr-201504008 · Foreign Personal Holding Company Income
- plr-201504007 · Nonrecognition of Gain or Loss to Corporations…
- plr-201504006 · Foreign Personal Holding Company Income
- plr-201504005 · Treatment of Variable Contracts
- plr-201504004 · Registration-required Obligations
- plr-201504003 · Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
- plr-201504002 · Reelection
- plr-201504001 · Reg. 301.7701-3 Classification of Certain Business…
- cca-201504016 · Miscellaneous Issues
- cca-201504015 · Restrictions on Examination of Taxpayer
- cca-201504011 · Gross Income v. Not Gross Income
- cca-201504010 · Real Property Business
- wd-201503015 · Period of Limitations for Making Assessments
- plr-201503010 · Investment Requirements
- plr-201503009 · Foreign Personal Holding Company Income
- plr-201503008 · Other
- plr-201503007 · Section 338(g); Election Under Section 1.338-1T(c)(1)
- plr-201503006 · Spin-Off
- plr-201503005 · Revocation of Elections
- plr-201503004 · Inadvertent Terminations
- plr-201503003 · Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections