CCA 201311026
Securities
ID:
Office:
UILC:
CCA_2012042613145247
---
6323.01-05
Number: 201311026
Release Date: 3/15/2013
From:---
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:15:01 PM
To:---
Cc:---
Subject: FW: Lien Priority Question ---
Hi ---
As noted below, under the facts provided it appears that the bank would have a superpriority under section 6323(b)(10), for deposit-secured loans. There is not much out there on 6323(b)(10) (a Lexis search pulled up only 3 cases), and I have not come across anything specifically addressing UCC 9-312 in this context, but the below excerpt from the GL training materials is useful:
Article 9 of the UCC allows a bank to obtain a security interest in a deposit account. Specifically, section 9-109 of Article 9 allows a security interest to be created in personal property. Section 9-109(d)(13), however, excludes consumer loans from the scope of Article 9, so a security interest may be created in only business loans. Section 9-314(a) provides that a security interest in a deposit account may be perfected by control. Under section 9-104(a)(1), a bank automatically has control when the bank maintains the deposit account. Section 9-104(b) provides that the bank still maintains control even if the depositor is allowed to withdraw funds from the account. There is no requirement that the bank file a UCC statement with the state. In effect, in most situations, the bank will automatically and secretly have perfected a security interest in the depositor's account. A bank’s claim to a section 6323(b)(10) superpriority, however, is not a defense to a levy. Rev. Rul. 2006-42, 2006-2 C.B. 337.
The Rev Rul cited also provides that we will generally release a levy once a bank establishes its superpriority interest. See also IRS CCA 200849001 (regarding application of 6323(b)(10) to taxpayer checking accounts).
From the facts provided, I don't see an argument here that there are any grounds to dispute the bank's superpriority claim unless the bank did not loan a "fixed and determinable sum." I have never seen a case where we have disputed a bank's security interest in a deposit account based upon lack of perfection by control.
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- cca-201226021 · Corporations
- cca-201225012 · Gaming & Shipping Industries - Class Life of…
- cca-201225011 · Determination of Rate of Interest; Compounding of…
- cca-201224033 · Backup Withholding
- cca-201224032 · Authority to Make Credits or Refunds
- cca-201224031 · Examination of Books and Witnesses
- cca-201224030 · Reproduction of Returns and Other Documents
- cca-201224029 · Computation of Tax Where Taxpayer Restores Substantial…
- tam-201223015 · Accrual Basis
- cca-201223018 · Collection Due Process - Levy
- cca-201223017 · Collection Due Process - Levy
- cca-201223016 · Further Deficiency Notice Restricted
- cca-201311026 · Securities
- cca-201222039 · Extension by Agreement
- cca-201222038 · Closing Agreements
- cca-201222037 · Partnership
- cca-201222001 · Determination of Rate of Interest; Compounding of…
- cca-201221019 · Exception for Small Partnerships
- cca-201221018 · Returns Regarding Payments of Interest
- cca-201221017 · Partnership Item
- cca-201221016 · Suspension of Statutory Period
- cca-201221015 · Partnerships v. Associations
- cca-201221013 · Election to Deduct or Capitalize Certain Expenditures
- cca-201220033 · Timeliness of Claim
- cca-201220032 · Authority to Postpone Certain Tax-Related Deadlines by…