CCA 201310032
Miscellaneous Issues
ID:
Office:
UILC:
CCA_2012032717260912
---
9999.00-00
Number: 201310032
Release Date: 3/8/2013
From: ---
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 5:26:10 PM
To: ---
Cc: ---
Subject: FW: --- - Hague Convention Apostille
---
The Convention applies only to public documents, and the sole function of the apostille is to certify the authenticity of the signature (in this case the notary's) on the document.
So while the apostille is a valid form of authentication, the only thing being authenticated in this case is the notary - not the document. To be eligible for an apostille, a document must first be issued or certified by an officer recognized by the authority that will issue the apostille. To exemplify the signature/document problem, in 2009 the Hague Conference decided to amend the wording on the Apostille to make it clear that no one was checking whether the document being attested was genuine or a fake. New wording to be used includes the following language: "This Apostille only certifies the signature, the capacity of the signer and the seal or stamp it bears. It does not certify the content of the document for which it was issued." So in the present case, if the notary is certifying the authenticity of the document (which I doubt) and that notary is recognized by an apostille issuing authority, then the apostille would be a viable alternative to the certified copies/originals route referred to in the email below.
To use the Apostille, the document(s) must first be notarized by an Israeli notary. [Here is the problem - unless the notary is certifying the document (not the signature) then it cannot be used] Those wishing to use a local notary for this service must contact them individually to see if they perform notaries. The notarized document must then be authenticated by the Magistrate's Court. Documents affixed with the apostille and the clerk's verification of the notary's signature using the above method, are just as acceptable in the US as those notarized [certified?] by the US Embassy. [even a US notarized document only attests to the signature - not the authenticity]
Hope this helps -
---
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- cca-201311025 · Administrative Adjustments Requests
- cca-201311022 · Wages
- cca-201311021 · Capital Expenditures (Deductible v. Not Deductible)
- cca-201310041 · Confidentiality and Disclosure of Returns and Return…
- cca-201310040 · Levy and Distraint
- cca-201310039 · Trade or Business (Deductible v. Not Deductible)
- cca-201310038 · Method of Delivery
- cca-201310037 · Limitations on Credit or Refund (Barred v. Not Barred)
- cca-201310036 · Closing Agreements
- cca-201310035 · Late Elections
- cca-201310034 · Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
- cca-201310033 · Method of Assessment
- cca-201310032 · Miscellaneous Issues
- cca-201310029 · Taxes Assessed Against Local Benefits
- cca-201310028 · Classification of Property
- cca-201310027 · Interest and Carrying Costs - Straddles
- cca-201309013 · Taxable Income Defined
- cca-201308030 · Equitable Remedies
- cca-201308029 · Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards and…
- cca-201308028 · Amounts Protected Against Loss
- cca-201308027 · Fines and Penalties
- cca-201308026 · Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards and…
- cca-201308025 · Deductions For Losses
- cca-201307007 · Tax Treatment Determined At Partnership Level
- cca-201307006 · Credit of Overpayment Against Any Tax Liability