CCA 201306022
Lien for Taxes (Lien Right v. No Lien Right)
ID:
Office:
UILC:
CCA_2012103110521454
---
6321.00-00
Number: 201306022
Release Date: 2/8/2013
From: ---
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:52:18 AM
To: ---
Cc:
Subject: RE: quick alter ego question
---
All is pretty well here in DC after the storm. Some folks have downed trees and lingering power outages to deal with, but this area got nothing compared to the devastation in New Jersey and New York.
A person's lack of legal ownership interest (as opposed to an equitable ownership interest) alone should not preclude us from determining that he is potentially an alter ego of a business. Some alter egos have no legal interest in their alter ego businesses by design. That said, your attorney should look at the whole picture and every potential factor when determining whether alter ego would apply. From a logical perspective, it is generally tougher to claim that a real person is an alter ego of a business than the other way around, because you are actually saying that all property owned by the person is property of the business. It is not impossible, however. I just reviewed a Tax Court case being appealed to the 11th Circuit (Eckhardt) where the Tax Court determined that a husband who owned shares of a gas station was the alter ego of the gas station, whereas the wife who did not own shares but was an officer was not an alter ego. At the end of the day, courts will take a holistic approach and weigh all the factors. BTW, our two common law factors that we espouse in the CC Notice are really just a "big picture" look at the many factors that states generally look to, it is just that some states put certain emphasis on specific facts more than the common law approach does.
As a whole, nominee is generally less onerous than alter ego, because it is property specific (e.g., Bob hold title to a car, although the business officers and employees use it, therefore the business has an equitable interest to such an extent that Bob really only holds legal title to the car as a nominee of the business). I generally recommend that attorneys try to see if nominee theory applies first before moving to the arguably more-challenging argument that a person is an alter ego of a business entity.
---
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- cca-201310028 · Classification of Property
- cca-201310027 · Interest and Carrying Costs - Straddles
- cca-201309013 · Taxable Income Defined
- cca-201308030 · Equitable Remedies
- cca-201308029 · Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards and…
- cca-201308028 · Amounts Protected Against Loss
- cca-201308027 · Fines and Penalties
- cca-201308026 · Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards and…
- cca-201308025 · Deductions For Losses
- cca-201307007 · Tax Treatment Determined At Partnership Level
- cca-201307006 · Credit of Overpayment Against Any Tax Liability
- cca-201307005 · Gross Income v. Not Gross Income
- cca-201306022 · Lien for Taxes (Lien Right v. No Lien Right)
- cca-201306021 · Taxable Income or Net Loss
- cca-201306019 · Definition and Special Rules
- cca-201306018 · Damages, Court Awards, Settlements
- cca-201306017 · Timeliness of Claim
- cca-201304008 · Tax Matters Partner
- cca-201304007 · Suits By U.S. for Recovery of Erroneous Refunds
- cca-201304006 · Extension of Time to Pay Estate Tax
- cca-201303016 · ADMINISTRATION: Personnel
- cca-201303015 · Additional First Year Depreciation
- cca-201303014 · Administrative Adjustments Requests
- cca-201303013 · Items Cease to Be Partnership Items in Certain Cases
- cca-201303012 · Partnerships