CCA 200945059
Other Requests
ID: CCA_2009091815414337 Number: 200945059
Release Date: 11/6/2009
Office: ---
UILC: 6227.05-00
From: ---
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 3:41:49 PM
To: ---
Cc: ---
Subject: RE: Barred Overassessment?
There is no agreement for a refund if we did not cosign the agreement. The agreement signed by only one party would also not likely constitute a valid AAR under Samuelli v. Commissioner. Under that precedent there is no informal claim doctrine as there is for non-TEFRA refunds. So taxpayer may not be entitled a refund. As a consequence, the mitigation issue appears moot.
---
---
---
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- cca-200946038 · Restrictions on Examination of Taxpayer
- cca-200946037 · Indirect Costs
- cca-200946035 · Administrative, Service, or Support Activities…
- tam-200945037 · Recapture of Excess Cost Recovery Deductions
- cca-200945067 · Similar Rules in Certain Cases
- cca-200945066 · Accuracy Related Penalty on Understatements with…
- cca-200945065 · Limitations on Assessment and Collection (Barred v. Not…
- cca-200945064 · 3 Years
- cca-200945063 · Partner
- cca-200945062 · Request for Tax Matters Partner
- cca-200945061 · Request for Tax Matters Partner
- cca-200945060 · Returns by Exempt Organizations
- cca-200945059 · Other Requests
- cca-200945058 · Limitations on Assessment and Collection (Barred v. Not…
- cca-200945057 · Service of Summons
- cca-200945056 · Adjusted Gross Income Defined
- cca-200945055 · Period of Limitations for Making Assessments
- cca-200945054 · Failure to Provide Notice
- cca-200945053 · Proceedings Not Finished
- cca-200945052 · Redemption by United States
- cca-200945051 · Extension to Entities Filing Partnership Returns, Etc.
- cca-200945050 · Administrative Adjustments Requests
- cca-200945049 · Disclosure to Taxpayer's Designee
- cca-200945048 · Penalty for Failure to Include Reportable Transaction…
- cca-200945047 · Reasonable Belief that Amount is Excludable