CCA 200927038
Tax Matters Partner
ID:
Office:
UILC:
CCA_2009051514030337
---
6231.07-00
Number: 200927038
Release Date: 7/2/2009
From: ---
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 2:03:07 PM
To: ---
Cc: ---
Subject: RE: TMP Bankruptcy question
1. See Triangle Investors v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 610 (1990); Western reserve, 95 T.C. 51,
September Partners, T.C. memo. 1990-33
2. Treat them as converted but issue an FPAA to them as a notice partner. This procedure was blessed on Third Dividend Dardanos, before the 9th Circuit.
3. Correct.
You can send it to just ---since we have to addresses updated in accordance with the regulation under section 6223(c)(2).
4. This is covered above
5. Correct
6. The FPAA's should be the same for everyone. Only the primary taxpayer needs the reports with a generic one to the partnership.
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- cca-200928041 · Extension by Agreement
- cca-200928040 · Receipts for Employees
- cca-200928039 · Not Employees Under Section 530 of 1978 Revenue Act
- cca-200928038 · Prohibited Transaction
- cca-200928037 · Extension of Time to Pay Estate Tax
- cca-200928034 · Partnership Item
- cca-200928033 · Settlement Agreement
- cca-200928032 · Notification
- cca-200928031 · Effect of Failure to Notify
- cca-200928030 · Levy and Distraint
- cca-200928029 · Charitable Deduction
- cca-200927039 · Notice to Partners of Proceedings
- cca-200927038 · Tax Matters Partner
- cca-200927037 · Married Individuals Living Apart
- cca-200927036 · Assessment of Partnership Items, Converted to…
- cca-200927035 · Determination of Amount of and Recognition of Gain or…
- cca-200927032 · Method of Adjustment
- cca-200927019 · Health Savings Accounts
- cca-200926027 · Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards and…
- cca-200926001 · Levy and Distraint
- cca-200925042 · Identifying Numbers
- cca-200925041 · Release of Exemption
- cca-200924051 · Exceptions to Notice
- cca-200924049 · Coordination with Bankruptcy Code
- cca-200924047 · Limitations on Assessment and Collection (Barred v. Not…