CCA 200922046
Omission of Income (25% Rule)--Exception to Period of Limitations
ID:
Office:
UILC:
CCA_2009040814492252
---
6501.08-07, 6501.07-00
Number: 200922046
Release Date: 5/29/2009
From: ---
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 2:49:31 PM
To: ---
Cc: ---
Subject: Section 6501, Validity of Consent to Extend SOL
This responds to your request for advice on the application of section 6501 to a series of four consents to extend the period of limitations; the second of which was unsigned by the Service. As a result of this omission and the statute of limitations concerns it raises for the particular tax year at issue, Appeals (which noted the error while the case was under consideration) has sent the case back to Service personnel for review/action. The Service has, in turn, asked for your advice on how to proceed.
Based upon the limited facts presented to us, we do not support an argument defending the validity of a Form 872 that was unsigned by the Service as this argument contravenes both the statute and our own regulation requiring execution by both parties. Section 6501 & Treas. Reg. 301.6501(c)-1(d).
Despite this "break in the chain" of consents which, in hindsight, likely caused the 3-year period under section 6501(a) to expire, for your further consideration, we posit an alternative argument that the third and fourth consents signed by both parties still validly extend the 6-year statute of limitations under section 6501(e). You have indicated that the facts of the case support the application of section 6501(e) due to a substantial omission. Therefore a valid Form 872 signed before the natural expiration of the 6year period, or during the extension period agreed upon by the taxpayer and the Service in a prior agreement, to a date beyond that expiration would extend the period of limitations for assessment; no reference to the 6-year period on Form 872 is necessary. Wang v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1998-389.
You have also mentioned the possible application of section 6501(c)(9) to this case. We do not opine on that particular point.
Please contact me with any further questions or comments.
Thank you,
---
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- cca-200923028 · Action for Recovery of Erroneous Refunds
- cca-200923027 · Income of an Estate or Trust in Case of Divorce, etc.
- cca-200923026 · Compensation v. Not Compensation
- cca-200923025 · Expenses and Interest Relating to Tax-Exempt Income…
- cca-200923024 · Administrative Powers
- cca-200922054 · Notice to Partners of Proceedings
- cca-200922053 · Validity and Priority of Lien Against Mortgagees,…
- cca-200922052 · Settlement Agreement
- cca-200922051 · Exception for Small Partnerships
- cca-200922050 · Settlement Agreement
- cca-200922049 · Lien for Taxes (Lien Right v. No Lien Right)
- cca-200922047 · Offers in Compromises
- cca-200922046 · Omission of Income (25% Rule)--Exception to Period of…
- cca-200922045 · Tax Matters Partner
- cca-200922044 · Partnership Item
- cca-200922043 · Notice to Partners of Proceedings
- cca-200922042 · Common Law Tests
- cca-200922041 · Disability
- cca-200922040 · Percentage of Completion Method
- cca-200922039 · Innocent spouse (including Sections 66, 6013)
- cca-200922038 · Welfare Benefit Fund
- cca-200922037 · Hand-carried Returns of Persons Other Than Corporations
- cca-200922036 · Payment by Check or Money Order
- cca-200922035 · S Corporation and Shareholder Returns
- cca-200922033 · Additional First Year Depreciation