CCA 200251007
Cases of Bankruptcy
OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
September 17, 2002
Number: 200251007 GL-133061-02
Release Date: 12/20/2002 CC:PA:APJP
UILC: 6402.01-03
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE LEGAL ADVICE
MEMORANDUM FOR MICHAEL J. O’BRIEN
ASSOCIATE AREA COUNSEL (SB/SE)
CC:SB:6:OKL
FROM: John J. McGreevy
Senior Advisor
CC:PA:APJP
SUBJECT: Request for Legal Advice Regarding Injured Spouse Claims
This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your memorandum dated July 1, 2002. In accordance with I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3), this Chief Counsel Advice should not be cited as precedent.
LEGEND
Taxpayer/Debtor =
Tax Year 1 =
Tax Year 2 =
Date 1 =
# ISSUE
Whether the Service is bound by Taxpayer’s allocations as submitted on Form
8379, Injured Spouse Claim and Allocation, when the allocations are not consistent with the guidelines for determining the amount of relief provided in Rev. Rul. 80-7, 1980-1 C.B. 296.
2
GL-133061-02
# CONCLUSION
If Taxpayer’s allocations on Form 8379 are not consistent with the guidelines set forth in Rev. Rul. 80-7, the Service is not bound by them. Therefore, the amount of injured spouse relief should be determined in accordance with Rev. Rul. 80-7.
# FACTS
Taxpayer (Debtor) filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition, which was subsequently converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding. Thereafter, Debtor and her nonpetitioning spouse filed joint Forms 1040 federal income tax returns for Tax Years 1 and 2, reflecting income tax refunds for both years. Although the Service attempted to obtain Debtor’s agreement to offset her post-petition income tax refunds against her pre-petition income tax liabilities, Debtor did not agree to the offset. On Date 1, Debtor filed Forms 8379 requesting her portion of the refunds for Tax Years 1 and 2.
You have indicated that Debtor’s allocations on the Forms 8379 are inconsistent with the information submitted on the joint Forms 1040 for those years, as well as the provisions of Rev. Rul. 80-7.
# LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 6402(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) provides that in the case of any overpayment, the Secretary, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit the amount of the overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability in respect of an internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment, and shall refund any balance to such person.
Rev. Rul. 74-611, 1974-2 C.B. 399, provides that when a husband and wife file a joint return, each spouse has a separate interest in the jointly reported income and a separate interest in any overpayment.
Injured spouse relief applies when a couple files jointly and their tax refund is reduced or eliminated because of an unpaid tax liability or other debt that only one of them owes. The injured spouse has a right to his/her share of the refund, based on an allocation between the spouses of income, deductions, payments, and other tax return items. Accordingly, Rev. Rul. 80-7 provides that if spouses file a joint return showing an overpayment, the amount that may be credited to one spouse’s separate liability is computed by subtracting that spouse’s share of the joint liability from his/her contribution toward the joint liability. The amount credited may not exceed that of the joint overpayment.
3
GL-133061-02
Section 21.4.6.4.11.1 of the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) provides that items of income, deductions, and exemptions shall be allocated as determined by the taxpayer on Form 8379, or as reported on the original return to arrive at the taxable income for each spouse in accordance with Rev. Rul. 80-7.
Although the IRM states that the Service should compute the amount of injured spouse relief based on allocations submitted by Debtor, the provision makes reference to the guidelines for determining the amount of relief set forth in Rev. Rul.
80-7. Therefore, if Debtor’s allocations on Forms 8379 are inconsistent with those guidelines, the Service is not bound by her allocations. Accordingly, Debtor’s allocable share of the overpayments should be computed according to the method provided in Rev. Rul. 80-7.
This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may have an adverse effect on privileges, such as the attorney client privilege. If disclosure becomes necessary, please contact this office for our views.
If you have any further questions, please contact our office at (202) 622-4910.
Source: view the official PDF
Nearby sections (25 sections)
- cca-200302043 · Discharge of Liens
- cca-200302016 · Insurance
- cca-200302001 · Extension by Agreement
- tam-200301004 · Not in Capacity as Partner
- cca-200301041 · Sale of Seized Property
- tam-200252059 · Interest Capitalization
- tam-200252032 · Charitable Deduction
- tam-200252029 · (Section 44 Redesignated as Section 29) Credits for…
- tam-200252028 · Income Forecast Method - Section 167(g)
- cca-200252091 · Repair v. Permanent Improvement
- cca-200251013 · Interest on Overpayments (Interest v. No Interest)
- cca-200251009 · Definitions
- cca-200251007 · Cases of Bankruptcy
- cca-200251004 · Alimony, etc., Payments
- cca-200251003 · Slovak Republic
- cca-200251002 · Action for Recovery of Erroneous Refunds
- cca-200251001 · Determination v. No Determination
- cca-200250019 · Tax on Early Distributions from Qualified Retirement…
- cca-200250013 · Partnership ISP - Subchapter K Anti-Abuse Rule…
- cca-200250012 · Definitions
- cca-200250001 · Collection Due Process - Levy
- tam-200249002 · Substantial Rights v. No Substantial Rights
- cca-200249001 · LEVY: Retirement benefits
- cca-200248016 · Change in Method of Accounting for Depreciation
- cca-200248008 · Compromises