61 Pa. Code § 155.26 — Average net income—fixed formula

(a) Average net income is the sum of the taxpayer’s net income or loss for each of the current and immediately preceding 4 years, divided by five. (b) Net income or loss is the amount set forth as income per books on the income tax return filed by the taxpayer with the Federal government, or if no return is made, as would have been set forth had the return been made. The net income or loss shall be computed on an unconsolidated basis exclusive of the net income or loss of an investee corporation and exclusive of the net income or loss of an investee corporation accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The amount set forth as income per books on the income tax return filed with the Federal government or as would have been set forth had the return been made, shall be adjusted to include dividends received from investee corporations, including dividends from investments accounted for under the consolidated or equity methods of accounting. (c) In computing average net income, losses shall be entered as computed, but the average net income may not be less than zero. (d) Net income or loss shall be subject to correction by the Department for fraud, evasion or error. (e) In the case of a taxpayer which has not been in existence for a period of 5 calendar years, average net income is the average net income for the number of years that the taxpayer has been in existence. A taxpayer in existence for a part of a year shall be considered to have been in existence for that year based on the number of days in the year that the taxpayer was in existence. Example 1. The taxpayer, incorporated August 1, 1982, reports on a calendar year basis. Its net income for the period August 1 through December 31, 1982 (153 days) was $20,000. Its net income for 1983 was $50,000 and for 1984, $70,000. Average net income for 1984 would be $57,870 ($140,000 ÷ 2 153/365). Example 2. The taxpayer filed on a calendar year basis until December 1980. In 1981 it changed its filing period to a fiscal year ending June 30. In order to do so, it filed a short period report for January 1 through June 30, 1981. Thereafter, taxpayer continued to file on a fiscal year basis. In computing average net income for the period ending June 30, 1985, taxpayer would include its January 1 through June 30, 1981 net income or loss as well as its July 1, 1981 through June 30, 1985 net income or loss and divide the result by 4 181/365. Example 3. The taxpayer, incorporated May 1, 1971, filed a calendar year report for 1980. Between January 1, 1981 and December 31, 1984, the taxpayer, as a result of various mergers and filing period changes, had 6 book years. The taxpayer’s average net income for 1984 would include the net income or loss for each of the 6 book years between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1984, divided by five. (f) Average net income does not include net income or loss of the corporation for a period of time prior to incorporation, such as net income or loss of a partnership prior to incorporation. Net income or loss of a predecessor corporation may not be attributed to a successor corporation. In the case of a mere change in identity, form or place of organization of one corporation, net income or loss prior to the change shall be utilized in determining average net income. Net income or loss may not be adjusted in the event of a change in corporate structure, but to the extent that a change occurs as a result of a tax evasion motive, net income or loss may be adjusted to negate the effects of the change in corporate structure. The following examples demonstrate the application of this subsection with respect to mergers, consolidations and reincorporations. Where there is evidence of a tax evasion motive, average net income will be determined based on the substance of the transaction. Example 1. Effective December 31, 1984, Corporation A merges into Corporation B. The net income or loss for the two corporations are: Year… Corporation A… Corporation B 1981…$60,000…$150,000 1982…$10,000…$100,000 1983…($100,000)…$ 80,000 1984…($100,000)…$ 60,000 Total 1985…— …$100,000 The average net income for 1985 for Corporation B, the corporation which survived the merger, would be $98,000 ($490,000 ÷ 5), determined without regard to the net income or loss of Corporation A prior to the merger. Example 2. Effective December 31, 1984, Corporation A and Corporation B consolidate to form a new corporation, Corporation C. Both Corporations A and B had been in existence for more than 5 years prior to the consolidation. Corporation C’s average net income would be determined for 1985 based only on the corporation’s net income or loss for 1985, and no recognition would be given to the net income or loss of either Corporation A or Corporation B prior to the consolidation. Example 3. Effective December 31, 1984, Corporation A, formerly incorporated in State Y, reincorporates in State X. The average net income for 1985 would be computed taking into account net income or loss for 1985, as well as net income or loss for the 4 years prior to January 1, 1985. (g) No adjustment to net income or loss may be made for Federal income tax which would have been paid by a corporation electing S Corporation treatment under Section 1361 of the IRC (26 U.S.C.A. § 1361) or for Commonwealth Corporate Net Income Tax which would have been paid by a corporation electing Pennsylvania S corporation treatment under article 3 of the TRC (72 P. S. § § 7301—7361), or for Commonwealth personal income tax paid by the shareholders of the corporation. (h) No adjustment to net income or loss may be permitted on account of nonrecurring or extraordinary items. (i) A taxpayer which totally ceases operations, has abandoned the business for which it was incorporated and is divested of assets shall be deemed to have ceased to exist for the purpose of computing average net income and upon recommencing business activities, shall be considered to have come into existence upon the date activities recommence. This subsection does not apply to situations where the cessation of activities occurred due to a tax evasion motive. (j) Corporations planning significant reductions in business operation, as well as corporations in the process of liquidating, should be aware of the effects tail earnings may have on subsequent years’ tax liability and plan accordingly. Authority The provisions of this § 155.26 issued under section 408 of the Tax Reform Code of 1971 (72 P. S. § 7408). Source The provisions of this § 155.26 adopted January 16, 1987, effective January 17, 1987, 17 Pa.B. 273. Notes of Decisions Application This section does not apply retroactively and the Department of Revenue followed the Department’s previously established interpretation of section 408 of the Tax Reform Code of 1972 (72 P. S. § 7408). Doyle Equipment Co. v. Commonwealth , 542 A.2d 644 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988). Calculating Tax Liability Under subsection (g), an S corporation may not assume the tax liability of its shareholders and then deduct that as an expense in calculating its annual net income for capital stock purposes. Scott Electric Co. v. Commonwealth , 692 A.2d 289 (Pa. 1997); exceptions overruled, decision adhered to 704 A.2d 205 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998). ‘‘Net income per books’’ as the term is used in calculating tax liability on capital stock values for Subchapter S Corporations did not permit corporations to deduct hyphothetical Federal income tax it did not pay. Tool Sales and Service Co., Inc. v. Commonwealth , 613 A.2d 143 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1992); affirmed 637 A.2d 607 (Pa. 1993). Capital Stock Value Corporation has not demonstrated a due process violation, but can claim only that where the total property, payroll, and sales of the unitary business enterprise included in the fractions of the three-factor formula, its tax due would be approximately 44.5% less than the figure arrived at by the Board of Finance and Revenue in its calculation under the three-factor formula because the 44.5% disparity between calculations does not lie outside of the constitutional margin of error delineated by the United States Supreme Court. Unisys Corp. v. Commonwealth , 812 A.2d 448 (Pa. 2002); cert. denied 540 U. S. 812 (U. S. 2003). Consistent with GAAP The regulatory treatment of income per books, by not allowing for adjustments for extraordinary or nonrecurring items, is consistent with the GAAP treatment of the same. Shawnee Development, Inc. v. Commonwealth , 799 A.2d 882 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002); dec. vacated 799 A.2d 882 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002), ord. aff’d 819 A.2d 528 (Pa. 2003). Fiscal Year There was no inconsistency between this regulation and section 601 of the Tax Reform Code (72 P. S. § 7601). This regulation reasonably supplements the statute by providing for a case where a corporation changes its fiscal year and shortens the period of its taxable year. The Department’s expertise in this area is entitled to deference in interpreting the statutes they enforce, particularly when such interpretation treats both new and old corporations in a uniform rather than discriminatory manner. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Commonwealth , 670 A.2d 722 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996); affirmed 691 A.2d 456 (Pa. 1997). Not Clearly Erroneous; Nonconfiscatory The taxpayer’s bald assertion that its stock must be of no value because it is insolvent is not sufficient to meet its heavy burden to show that the regulation is clearly erroneous, or that it works an unconstitutional confiscation of its property. Shawnee Development, Inc. v. Commonwealth , 799 A.2d 882 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002), dec. vacated 799 A.2d 882 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002), order aff’d. 819 A.2d 528 (Pa. 2003). Cross References This section cited in 61 Pa. Code § 155.21 (relating to general). No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit. This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Code full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.